APA
DiStefano, Marina T. & Hemphill, Sarah E. & Oza, Andrea M. & Siegert, Rebecca K. & Grant, Andrew R. & Y. Hughes, Madeline & Cushman, Brandon J. & Azaiez, Hela & Booth, Kevin T. & Chapin, Alex & Duzkale, Hatice & Matsunaga, Tatsuo & Shen, Jun & Zhang, Wenying & Kenna, Margaret & Schimmenti & Tekin, Mustafa & Rehm, Heidi L. & Abou Tayoun, Ahmad N. & Amr, Sami S. & ClinGen Hearing Loss Clinical Domain Working Group & Moreno Pelayo, Miguel Angel (2009-06 ) .ClinGen Expert Clinical Validity Curation of 164 Hearing Loss Gene-Disease Pairs.
ISO 690
DiStefano, Marina T. & Hemphill, Sarah E. & Oza, Andrea M. & Siegert, Rebecca K. & Grant, Andrew R. & Y. Hughes, Madeline & Cushman, Brandon J. & Azaiez, Hela & Booth, Kevin T. & Chapin, Alex & Duzkale, Hatice & Matsunaga, Tatsuo & Shen, Jun & Zhang, Wenying & Kenna, Margaret & Schimmenti & Tekin, Mustafa & Rehm, Heidi L. & Abou Tayoun, Ahmad N. & Amr, Sami S. & ClinGen Hearing Loss Clinical Domain Working Group & Moreno Pelayo, Miguel Angel. 2009-06 .ClinGen Expert Clinical Validity Curation of 164 Hearing Loss Gene-Disease Pairs.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/39724
Résumé:
Purpose: Proper interpretation of genomic variants is critical to successful medical decision
making based on genetic testing results. A fundamental prerequisite to accurate variant
interpretation is the clear understanding of the clinical validity of gene-disease relationships. The
Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) has developed a semi-quantitative framework to assign
clinical validity to gene-disease relationships.
Methods: The ClinGen Hearing Loss Gene Curation Expert Panel (HL GCEP) uses this
framework to perform evidence-based curations of genes present on testing panels from 17 clinical
laboratories in the Genetic Testing Registry. The HL GCEP curated and reviewed 142 genes and
164 gene-disease pairs, including 105 nonsyndromic and 59 syndromic forms of hearing loss.
Results: The final outcome included 82 Definitive (50%), 12 Strong (7%), 25 Moderate (15%),
32 Limited (20%), 10 Disputed (6%), and 3 Refuted (2%) classifications. The summary of each
curation is date stamped with the HL GCEP approval, is live, and will be kept up-to-date on the
ClinGen website (https://search.clinicalgenome.org/kb/gene-validity).
Conclusion: This gene curation approach serves to optimize the clinical sensitivity of genetic
testing while reducing the rate of uncertain or ambiguous test results caused by the interrogation of
genes with insufficient evidence of a disease link.
Keywords
gene curation; ClinGen; deafness; genetic diagnosis; hearing loss