APA
Truchuelo, M.T. & Pérez, B. & Fernández Guarino, Montserrat & Moreno, C. & Jaén Olasolo, P. (2013 ) .Fluorescence diagnosis and photodynamic therapy for Bowen¿s disease treatment.
ISO 690
Truchuelo, M.T. & Pérez, B. & Fernández Guarino, Montserrat & Moreno, C. & Jaén Olasolo, P.. 2013 .Fluorescence diagnosis and photodynamic therapy for Bowen¿s disease treatment.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/39636
Abstract:
Introduction It has already been demonstrated the high efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for Bowen¿s
disease (BD) treatment. Fluorescence diagnosis consists on registration of the fluorescence emitted by tissue after
application of a photosensitizer, indicating presence of tumoral cells. It has been described as a useful tool for
actinic keratosis. Different results have been published about fluorescence diagnosis for basal cell carcinomas. Very
few reports about the role of fluorescence diagnosis for this entity exist and this is the first one which correlates the
fluorescence image after PDT with the histopathological response.
Objectives To assess the role of fluorescence diagnosis during BD follow-up.
Methods We carried out an observational, retrospective and descriptive study. A total of 29 BD biopsy proven
lesions were included. All the lesions had been treated with the standard protocol (Topical methyl- aminolaevulinic
acid under occlusion for 3 hours and followed by illumination with red-light (630 nm, 38J ¿ cm2
, 7.5 minutes. Two
sessions one week apart). Clinical and fluorescence photographs were taken before treatment and one month after
the 2nd one. At that moment a post-treatment biopsy was performed. Clinical response was classified as partial,
complete or no response. Fluorescence response was classified as negative, intermediate or intense. The follow-up
period and the adverse events observed including pain were also collected.
Results We found statistical association between fluorescence and the clinical and histopathological evaluations
performed after treatment. Fluorescence diagnosis obtained a 100% sensitivity (higher than clinical evaluation alone)
and a specificity of 85.7% (CI: 70.8-100).
Conclusions Fluorescence diagnosis seems a valid diagnostic tool, useful during the follow up of Bowen disease
lesions with the advantage of avoiding unnecessary post-treatment biopsies.