APA
González Rueda, Juan Ramón & García Ávila, Irene & de Paz Hermoso, Víctor Manuel & Riad Deglow, Elena & Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro & Pato Mourelo, Jesús & Montero Martín, Javier & Hernández Montero, Sofía .Accuracy of a Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation System in the Placement of Zygomatic Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.
ISO 690
González Rueda, Juan Ramón & García Ávila, Irene & de Paz Hermoso, Víctor Manuel & Riad Deglow, Elena & Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro & Pato Mourelo, Jesús & Montero Martín, Javier & Hernández Montero, Sofía. Accuracy of a Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation System in the Placement of Zygomatic Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/29438
Abstract:
The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of zygomatic dental implant (ZI) placement carried out using a dynamic navigation system. Materials and
Methods: Forty (40) ZIs were randomly distributed into one of two study groups: (A) ZI placement
via a computer-aided dynamic navigation system (n = 20) (navigation implant (NI)); and (B) ZI
placement using a conventional free-hand technique (n = 20) (free-hand implant (FHI)). A cone-beam
computed tomography (CBCT) scan of the existing situation was performed preoperatively to plan
the surgical approach for the computer-aided study group. Four zygomatic dental implants were
placed in anatomically based polyurethane models (n = 10) manufactured by stereolithography, and a
postoperative CBCT scan was performed. Subsequently, the preoperative planning and postoperative
CBCT scans were added to dental implant software to analyze the coronal entry point, apical end
point, and angular deviations. Results were analyzed using the Student¿s t-test. Results: The results
showed statistically significant differences in the apical end-point deviations between FHI and NI
(p = 0.0018); however, no statistically significant differences were shown in the coronal entry point
(p = 0.2617) or in the angular deviations (p = 0.3132). Furthermore, ZIs placed in the posterior region
showed more deviations than the anterior region at the coronal entry point, apical end point, and
angular level. Conclusions: The conventional free-hand technique enabled more accurate placement
of ZIs than the computer-assisted surgical technique. In addition, placement of ZIs in the anterior
region was more accurate than that in the posterior region.
Keywords: implantology; computer-aided surgery; image-guided surgery; zygomatic implants;
navigation system