Afficher la notice abrégée
APA
López Martín, Ana (2017-04 ) .Randomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib versus Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Non¿Small Cell Lung Cancer Failing First-Line Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy Stratified by VeriStrat Good versus VeriStrat Poor. The European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) EMPHASIS-lung Trial.
ISO 690
López Martín, Ana. 2017-04 .Randomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib versus Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Non¿Small Cell Lung Cancer Failing First-Line Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy Stratified by VeriStrat Good versus VeriStrat Poor. The European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) EMPHASIS-lung Trial.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/39501
dc.contributor.author |
López Martín, Ana
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-02-05T09:49:52Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-02-05T09:49:52Z |
|
dc.date.created |
2017-04 |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017-04 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/39501 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Introduction: Docetaxel and erlotinib are registered second line treatments for wild-type EGFR NSCLC. Previous studies
suggested a predictive value of the VeriStrat test in second line therapy of NSCLC, classifying patients as either VeriStrat
good or VeriStrat poor. EMPHASIS-lung aimed at exploring
this predictive effect in patients with squamous cell NSCLC.
The trial closed prematurely because of low accrual and re sults from other trials. Our analysis includes an exploratory
combined analysis with results from the PROSE trial.
Methods: EMPHASIS-lung was a randomized phase III
multicenter trial exploring the differential effect of second line erlotinib versus docetaxel on progression-free survival
(PFS) in VeriStrat good versus VeriStrat poor patients with
squamous cell NSCLC.
Results: A total of 80 patients were randomized, with
72.5% categorized as VeriStrat good. Patient characteristics
were balanced between VeriStrat status and treatment
groups. The median PFS times with docetaxel and erlotinib
treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 4.1 and 1.6
months, respectively, versus 1.9 and 2.1 months, respec tively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. The median overall
survival (OS) times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment
in the VeriStrat good cohort were 7.8 and 8.4 months,
respectively, and 4.4 and 5.2 months, respectively, in the
VeriStrat poor cohort. An additional exploratory analysis
was performed; in it, 47 patients from the squamous cell
subgroup of PROSE were included in a combined analysis,
contributing with 45 PFS and 41 OS events.
Conclusions: The final analysis of EMPHASIS-lung did not
show a differential effect on PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel
stratified by VeriStrat status. Similarly, in the combined
analysis, no significant treatment by VeriStrat status inter action was observed (interaction p ¼0.24 for PFS and 0.45 for
OS, stratified by study).
2017 International Association for the Study of Lung
Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: NSCLC; Squamous; Erlotinib; Docetaxel; ETOP;
VeriStrat |
es_ES |
dc.format |
application/pdf |
es_ES |
dc.language |
eng |
es_ES |
dc.rights |
CC-BY |
es_ES |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es |
es_ES |
dc.title |
Randomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib versus Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Non¿Small Cell Lung Cancer Failing First-Line Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy Stratified by VeriStrat Good versus VeriStrat Poor. The European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) EMPHASIS-lung Trial |
es_ES |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
es_ES |
dc.rights.accessrights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
es_ES |
dc.identifier.location |
N/A |
es_ES |
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)
Afficher la notice abrégée
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que CC-BY