Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio

Analysis of the Importance of the Motion Used in the Resistance of Different Mechanical Instrumentation Systems in Endodontics: A Comparative Study

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

APA

Mena Álvarez, Jesús & Almanzor López, Manuel & Quispe López, Norberto & de Pedro Muñoz, Ana & Rico Romano, Cristina (2022-06 ) .Analysis of the Importance of the Motion Used in the Resistance of Different Mechanical Instrumentation Systems in Endodontics: A Comparative Study.

ISO 690

Mena Álvarez, Jesús & Almanzor López, Manuel & Quispe López, Norberto & de Pedro Muñoz, Ana & Rico Romano, Cristina. 2022-06 .Analysis of the Importance of the Motion Used in the Resistance of Different Mechanical Instrumentation Systems in Endodontics: A Comparative Study.

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/29658
dc.contributor.author Mena Álvarez, Jesús
dc.contributor.author Almanzor López, Manuel
dc.contributor.author Quispe López, Norberto
dc.contributor.author de Pedro Muñoz, Ana
dc.contributor.author Rico Romano, Cristina
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-14T08:18:02Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-14T08:18:02Z
dc.date.created 2022-06-24
dc.date.issued 2022-06
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/29658
dc.description.abstract Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue strength of different reciprocating rotary systems depending on the movement used. Methods: Four study groups were analyzed (n = 30): (1) Reciproc®, (2) Reciproc Blue®, (3) Wave One Gold® and (4) Procodile®. Each group was divided into three subgroups according to the motion used: (A) Reflex Dynamic® (n = 10), (B) ReFlex Smart® (n = 10) and (C) conventional reciprocating motion (n = 10). They were used in a dynamic cyclic fatigue prototype until their fracture, and the time was measured in seconds. The results obtained were analyzed with the ANOVA method, and for two-to-two comparisons, the Tukey method and Weibull statistics were used. Results: Procodile ReFlex Smart had the longest time to failure, and statistically significant differences were found between Procodile ReFlex Smart and the other files and motions (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Smart motions increase cyclic fatigue strength. ReFlex Smart® motion increases the cyclic fatigue strength of reciprocating rotary systems, and Procodile® ReFlex Smart was the most resistant system file. Keywords: cyclic fatigue; endodontics; Procodile; reciprocating movement; reflex smart dynamic; smart motion es_ES
dc.format application/pdf es_ES
dc.language eng es_ES
dc.rights CC-BY es_ES
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es es_ES
dc.title Analysis of the Importance of the Motion Used in the Resistance of Different Mechanical Instrumentation Systems in Endodontics: A Comparative Study es_ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article es_ES
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess es_ES
dc.identifier.location N/A es_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

CC-BY Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como CC-BY

Buscar en DSpace


Listar

Mi cuenta

Social Media