Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Cáceres Madroño, Esther![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez Torres, Paulina Andrea![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Oussama, Soraya | |
dc.contributor.author | Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Bufalá Pérez, María![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Mena Álvarez, Jesús![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Riad Deglow, Elena![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Hernández Montero, Sofía![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-09T13:19:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-09T13:19:01Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-10-15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/26159 | |
dc.description.abstract | To compare and contrast the accuracy of piezoelectric ultrasonic insert (PUI) and trephine bur (TB) osteotomy site preparation techniques for apical location. (1) Material and methods: A total of 138 osteotomy site preparations were randomly distributed into one of two study groups. Group A: TB technique (n = 69) and B: PUI technique (n = 69). A preoperative cone-beam computed tomography scan and an intraoral scan were performed and uploaded to implant-planning software to plan the virtual osteotomy site preparations for apical location. Subsequently, the osteotomy site preparations were performed in the experimental models with both osteotomy site preparation techniques and a postoperative CBCT scan was performed and uploaded into the implant-planning software and matched with the virtually planned osteotomy site preparations to measure the deviation angle and horizontal deviation as captured at the coronal entry point and apical end-point between osteotomy site preparations using Student¿s t-test statistical analysis. (2) Results: The paired t-test found statistically significant differences at the coronal entry-point deviations (p = 0.0104) and apical end-point deviations (p = 0.0104) between the TB and PUI study groups; however, no statistically significant differences were found in the angular deviations (p = 0.309) between the trephine bur and piezoelectric ultrasonic insert study groups. (3) Conclusions: The results showed that the TB is more accurate than the PUI for apical location. | es_ES |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_ES |
dc.language | eng | es_ES |
dc.rights | CC-BY | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es | es_ES |
dc.subject | apical location; apicoectomy; cone-beam computed tomography scan; piezoelectric; trephine bur | es_ES |
dc.title | A Comparative Analysis of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Appliance and Trephine Bur for Apical Location: An In Vitro Study | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.location | N/A | es_ES |