DSpace Repository

A Comparative Analysis of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Appliance and Trephine Bur for Apical Location: An In Vitro Study

Show simple item record

APA

Cáceres Madroño, Esther & Rodríguez Torres, Paulina Andrea & Oussama, Soraya & Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro & Bufalá Pérez, María & Mena Álvarez, Jesús & Riad Deglow, Elena & Hernández Montero, Sofía .A Comparative Analysis of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Appliance and Trephine Bur for Apical Location: An In Vitro Study.

ISO 690

Cáceres Madroño, Esther & Rodríguez Torres, Paulina Andrea & Oussama, Soraya & Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro & Bufalá Pérez, María & Mena Álvarez, Jesús & Riad Deglow, Elena & Hernández Montero, Sofía. A Comparative Analysis of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Appliance and Trephine Bur for Apical Location: An In Vitro Study.

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/26159
dc.contributor.author Cáceres Madroño, Esther
dc.contributor.author Rodríguez Torres, Paulina Andrea
dc.contributor.author Oussama, Soraya
dc.contributor.author Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro
dc.contributor.author Bufalá Pérez, María
dc.contributor.author Mena Álvarez, Jesús
dc.contributor.author Riad Deglow, Elena
dc.contributor.author Hernández Montero, Sofía
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-09T13:19:01Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-09T13:19:01Z
dc.date.created 2021-10-15
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/26159
dc.description.abstract To compare and contrast the accuracy of piezoelectric ultrasonic insert (PUI) and trephine bur (TB) osteotomy site preparation techniques for apical location. (1) Material and methods: A total of 138 osteotomy site preparations were randomly distributed into one of two study groups. Group A: TB technique (n = 69) and B: PUI technique (n = 69). A preoperative cone-beam computed tomography scan and an intraoral scan were performed and uploaded to implant-planning software to plan the virtual osteotomy site preparations for apical location. Subsequently, the osteotomy site preparations were performed in the experimental models with both osteotomy site preparation techniques and a postoperative CBCT scan was performed and uploaded into the implant-planning software and matched with the virtually planned osteotomy site preparations to measure the deviation angle and horizontal deviation as captured at the coronal entry point and apical end-point between osteotomy site preparations using Student¿s t-test statistical analysis. (2) Results: The paired t-test found statistically significant differences at the coronal entry-point deviations (p = 0.0104) and apical end-point deviations (p = 0.0104) between the TB and PUI study groups; however, no statistically significant differences were found in the angular deviations (p = 0.309) between the trephine bur and piezoelectric ultrasonic insert study groups. (3) Conclusions: The results showed that the TB is more accurate than the PUI for apical location. es_ES
dc.format application/pdf es_ES
dc.language eng es_ES
dc.rights CC-BY es_ES
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es es_ES
dc.subject apical location; apicoectomy; cone-beam computed tomography scan; piezoelectric; trephine bur es_ES
dc.title A Comparative Analysis of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Appliance and Trephine Bur for Apical Location: An In Vitro Study es_ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article es_ES
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess es_ES
dc.identifier.location N/A es_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC-BY Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC-BY

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Social Media