DSpace Repository

Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers UsingWarm Gutta-Percha Technique

Show simple item record

APA

Mena Álvarez, Jesús & Theophanie Sevrain, Juliette & Zorita García, Mario & Rico Romano, Cristina (2021-07 ) .Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers UsingWarm Gutta-Percha Technique.

ISO 690

Mena Álvarez, Jesús & Theophanie Sevrain, Juliette & Zorita García, Mario & Rico Romano, Cristina. 2021-07 .Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers UsingWarm Gutta-Percha Technique.

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/25300
dc.contributor.author Mena Álvarez, Jesús
dc.contributor.author Theophanie Sevrain, Juliette
dc.contributor.author Zorita García, Mario
dc.contributor.author Rico Romano, Cristina
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-30T13:30:09Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-30T13:30:09Z
dc.date.created 2021-07-07
dc.date.issued 2021-07
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/25300
dc.description.abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo the sealing achieved at simulated lateral canals (SLC) and the quality of filling according to their position in the root canal after using the same filling technique. SLC were created at three levels in 55 teeth and divided into two groups depending on the root canal sealer used (1: BioRoot® RCS, 2: GuttaFlow® bioseal). They filled them with the continuous wave technique and submitted to a diaphanization technique. The samples were analyzed using a magnifying lens (20 ), pictures were taken, which proceeded to linear measurement with the ImageJ® program and used a filling score system with five grades (0 to 4, 0 and 1 not acceptable, 2 to 4 acceptable); BioRoot® RCS has got a greater proportion than GuttaFlow® bioseal for SLC filled acceptably at 10 mm from the apex (p < 0.05). The highest proportion of SLC filled acceptably was found in the middle third (6 mm) (p < 0.05), followed by the apical third (3 mm) and the coronal third (10 mm). The difference between apical and coronal third could be significant; BioRoot® RCS has been better than GuttaFlow® bioseal for filling SLC in the coronal third of the teeth. Studies on the characteristics of these cements are missing to explain these differences. Keywords: bioceramics; root canal sealers; simulated lateral canals; warm obturation; extrusion es_ES
dc.format application/pdf es_ES
dc.language eng es_ES
dc.rights CC-BY es_ES
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es es_ES
dc.title Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers UsingWarm Gutta-Percha Technique es_ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article es_ES
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess es_ES
dc.identifier.location N/A es_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC-BY Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC-BY

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Social Media