APA
Herrera Peco, Ivan & Santillán García, Azucena & Morán, José María & Goodman Casanova, Jessica Marian & Cuesta Lozano, Daniel .The Evidence-Based Practice Silent Enemy: Retracted Articles and Their Use in Systematic Reviews.
ISO 690
Herrera Peco, Ivan & Santillán García, Azucena & Morán, José María & Goodman Casanova, Jessica Marian & Cuesta Lozano, Daniel. The Evidence-Based Practice Silent Enemy: Retracted Articles and Their Use in Systematic Reviews.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/24559
Resumen:
Today, evidence-based nursing practice strives to improve health care, ensure adherence to
treatment, improve health outcomes, and guarantee patient safety. The main scientific documents that
nurses should consult, to obtain the best possible evidence, are systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
However, this type of scientific document has a major issue if it uses retracted articles that could
directly a ect the consistency of the results shown in the reviews. The aim of this commentary is to
present the current issue represented by the use of retracted articles in meta-analyses of systematic
reviews and how researchers could detect them, through the use of di erent instruments, avoiding
them, and providing a reliable SR or meta-analysis that could be useful for day-to-day clinical and
research activities.
Keywords: evidence-based practice; research methodology; nurses; retracted articles