Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | de Pedro Muñoz, Ana![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Riad Deglow, Elena![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Agustín Panadero, Rubén | |
dc.contributor.author | Mena Álvarez, Jesús![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-09T16:46:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-09T16:46:24Z | |
dc.date.created | 2020-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/24010 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of two computer-aided navigation techniques to guide the performance of endodontic access cavities compared with the conventional access procedure. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 single-rooted anterior teeth were selected, which were randomly distributed into three study groups: Group A¿guided performance of endodontic access cavities through computer-aided static navigation system (n = 10) (SN); Group B¿guided performance of endodontic access cavities through computer-aided dynamic navigation system (n = 10) (DN); and Group C¿manual (freehand) performance of endodontic access cavities (n = 10) (MN). The endodontic access cavities of the SN group were performed with a stereolithography template designed on 3D implant planning software, based on preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a 3D extraoral surface scan, and endodontic access cavities of the DN group were planned and performed by the dynamic navigation system. After endodontic access cavities were performed, a second CBCT was done, and the degree of accuracy between the planned and performed endodontic access cavities was analyzed using therapeutic planning software and Student¿s t-test. Results: Paired t-test revealed no statistically significant di erences between SN and DN at the coronal (p = 0.6542), apical (p = 0.9144), or angular (p = 0.0724) level; however, statistically significant di erences were observed between the two computer-aided navigation techniques and the MN group at the coronal (p < 0.0001), apical (p < 0.0001), and angular (p < 0.0001) level. Conclusion: Both computer-aided static and dynamic navigation procedures allowed accurate performance of endodontic access cavities. | es_ES |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_ES |
dc.language | eng | es_ES |
dc.rights | CC-BY | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | N/A | es_ES |
dc.title | Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Procedure for Endodontic Access Cavities: An In Vitro Study | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.location | N/A | es_ES |