APA
Agustín Panadero, Rubén & Bustamante Hernández, Naia & Solá Ruíz, María Fernanda & Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro & Fons Font, Antonio & Fernández Estevan, Lucía .Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues.
ISO 690
Agustín Panadero, Rubén & Bustamante Hernández, Naia & Solá Ruíz, María Fernanda & Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro & Fons Font, Antonio & Fernández Estevan, Lucía. Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/24007
Resumen:
Purpose: The objective of this prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to analyze and
compare the clinical behavior of three types of prosthesis supported by single implants in the posterior
region after three years functional loading. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five implants were
divided into three groups according to the type of prosthetic restoration: screw-retained crown (Group
GS); cemented crown without finishing line (biologically oriented preparation technique) (Group
GBOPT); and conventional cemented crown with finishing line (Group GCC). The clinical behavior
of each restoration type was analyzed after 3 years functional loading by analyzing radiographic
peri-implant bone loss. Results: GBOPT obtained the least bone loss (p < 0.01) in comparison with GS
and GCC. Conclusions: Bone loss around implants is related to the type of prosthetic restoration it
supports, whereby cemented BOPT crowns present less bone loss.
