DSpace Repository

Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study

Show simple item record

APA

Mediavilla Guzmán, Alfonso & Riad Deglow, Elena & Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro & Agustín Panadero, Rubén & Hernández Montero, Sofía .Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study.

ISO 690

Mediavilla Guzmán, Alfonso & Riad Deglow, Elena & Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro & Agustín Panadero, Rubén & Hernández Montero, Sofía. Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study.

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/24006
dc.contributor.author Mediavilla Guzmán, Alfonso
dc.contributor.author Riad Deglow, Elena
dc.contributor.author Zubizarreta Macho, Álvaro
dc.contributor.author Agustín Panadero, Rubén
dc.contributor.author Hernández Montero, Sofía
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-09T16:32:09Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-09T16:32:09Z
dc.date.created 2019-12
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/24006
dc.description.abstract Aim: To analyze the accuracy capability of two computer-aided navigation procedures for dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 dental implants were selected, which were randomly distributed into two study groups, namely, group A, consisting of those implants that were placed using a computer-aided static navigation system (n = 20) (guided implant (GI)) and group B, consisting of those implants that were placed using a computer-aided dynamic navigation system (n = 20) (navigation implant (NI)). The placement of the implants from group A was performed using surgical templates that were designed using 3D implant-planning software based on preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a 3D extraoral surface scan, and the placement of group B implants was planned and performed using the dynamic navigation system. After placing the dental implants, a second CBCT was performed and the degree of accuracy of the planning and placement of the implants was analyzed using therapeutic planning software and Student¿s t-test. Results: The paired t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between GI and NI at the coronal (p = 0.6535) and apical (p = 0.9081) levels; however, statistically significant differences were observed between the angular deviations of GI and NI (p = 0.0272). Conclusion: Both computer-aided static and dynamic navigation procedures allow accurate implant placement. es_ES
dc.format application/pdf es_ES
dc.language eng es_ES
dc.rights CC-BY es_ES
dc.rights.uri N/A es_ES
dc.title Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study es_ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article es_ES
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess es_ES
dc.identifier.location N/A es_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Social Media